Estimation of electrical conductivity of a soil solution from the monitored TDR data and an extracted soil solution
More details
Hide details
Natural Science Laboratory, Toyo University, 5-28-20 Hakusan, Tokyo 112-8606, Japan
Agricultural Environment Engineering Research Division, Institute for Rural Engineering, NARO, 2-1-6 Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8609, Japan
Publish date: 2019-02-14
Acceptance date: 2018-11-04
Int. Agrophys. 2019, 33(1): 113–119
In order to establish sustainable agricultural practices and to avoid excess fertiliser application, it appears important to understand the process of water and solute transport. With a view to analysing transport through the soil, based on the data obtained by means of time domain reflectometry, the relationship between the volumetric water content, the apparent electrical conductivity, and the soil solution electrical conductivity should be known. This paper proposes a new method for estimating the three parameters relationship by optimising the parameters obtained through Rhoades model with the Levenberg-Marquardt method. The proposed method systematically determines the initial parameter set required to conduct nonlinear optimisation. The method was used to estimate the continuous apparent electrical conductivity data based on the time domain reflectometry dataset, obtained from the field and occasional measurement of soil solution electrical conductivity data of the soil water, which was extracted by means of a suction sampler installed in the field. Compared with the conventional method where the parameters of Rhoades model are calibrated with a 2-step linear regression by means of laboratory experiment, the soil solution electrical conductivity estimated with the proposed method was closer to the field data, yielding smaller root mean square error values. Supplementary use of the dataset obtained through a laboratory experiment under dry and wet conditions improved the accuracy of parameter estimation.
1. Baumgartner N., Parkin G.W., and Elrick D.E., 1994. Soil water content and potential measured by hollow time domain reflectometry probe. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 58, 315-318.
2. Das B.S., Wraith J.M., and Inskeep W.P., 1999. Nitrate concentrations in the root zone estimated using time domain reflectometry. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 63, 1561-1570.
3. De Neve S., van de Steene S., Hartmann R., and Hofman G., 2000. Using time domain reflectometry for monitoring mineralization of nitrogen from soil organic matter. European J. Soil Sci., 51(2), 295-304.
4. Gupta S.C. and Hanks R.J., 1972. Influence of Water content on electrical conductivity of the soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 36, 855-857.
5. Heimovaara T.J., 1995. Assessing temporal variations in soil water composition with time domain reflectometry. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 59, 689-698.
6. Hilhorst M.A., 2000. A pore water conductivity sensor. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 64, 1922-1925.
7. IUSS Working Group, 2014. World reference base for soil resources 2014 international soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. FAO, Rome.
8. Malicki M.A. and Walczak R.T., 1999. Evaluating soil salinity status from bulk electrical conductivity and permittivity. European J. Soil Sci., 50, 505-514.
9. Mallants D., Vanclooster M., Toride N., Vanderbrorght J., van Genuchten M.Th. and Feyen J., 1996. Comparison of three methods to calibrate TDR for monitoring solute movement in unsaturated soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 60, 747-754.
10. Marquardt D.W., 1963. An algorithm for least-square estimation of nonlinear parameters. J. Soc. Industrial Appl. Mathematics, 11(2), 431-441.
11. Miyamoto T., Kameyama K., and Iwata Y., 2015. Monitoring electrical conductivity and nitrate concentrations in an Andisol field using time domain reflectometry. Japan Agric. Res. Quarterly, 49(3), 261-267.
12. Mualem Y. and Friedman S.P., 1991. Theoretical prediction of electrical conductivity in saturated and unsaturated soil. Water Res. Res., 27, 2771-2777.
13. Muñoz-Carpena R., Regalado, C.M., Ritter A., Alvarez-Benedi J., and Socorro A.R., 2005. TDR estimation of electrical conductivity and saline solute concentration in a volcanic soil. Geoderma, 124, 399-413.
14. Noborio K., 2001. Measurement of soil water content and electrical conductivity by time domain reflectometry: a review. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 36, 113-132.
15. Risler P.D., Wraith J.M., and Gaber H.M., 1996. Solute transport under transient flow conditions estimated using time domain refrectometry. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 60, 1297-1305.
16. Rhoades J.D., Manteghi N.A., Shouse P.J., and Alves W.J., 1989. Soil electrical conductivity and soil salinity: New formulations and calibrations. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 53, 433-439.
17. Rhoades J.D., Raats P.A., and Prather R.J., 1976. Effects of liquid-phase electrical conductivity, water content, and surface conductivity on bulk soil electrical conductivity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 40, 651-655.
18. Scudiero E., Berti A., Teatini P., and Morari F., 2012. Simultaneous monitoring of soil water content and salinity with a low-cost capacitance-resistance probe. Sensors, 12, 17588-17607.
19. Seki K., 2007. SWRC fit – a nonlinear fitting program with a water retention curve for soils having unimodal and bimodal pore structure. Hydrology Earth System Sci. Discussions, 4(1), 403-437.
20. Šimůnek J. and Hopmans J.W., 2002. Parameter Optimization and Nonlinear Fitting. in Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 4 Physical Methods, 139-158. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WIS, USA.
21. Vaz C.M.P., Jones S., Meding M., and Tuller M., 2013. Evaluation of standerd calibration function for eight electromagnetic soil moisture sensors. Vadose Zone J., 12(2), doi: 10.2136/vzj2012.0160.
22. Wilczek A., Szypłowska A., Skierucha W., Cieśla J., and Pichler V., Janik G., 2012. Determination of soil pore water salinity using an FDR sensor working at various frequencies up to 500 MHz. Sensors, 12, 10890-10905.