Current issue
Archive
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Journal Insights
Contact us
Publisher
Article Processing Charge
Editorial Policy
Peer Review Process
Publication Ethics
Guidelines
For Authors
For Reviewers
For Editors
Step-by-step Guide to Article Publishing
How to Promote Your Published Article
Reviewers
RESEARCH PAPER
Sequence and preference in the use of electron acceptors in flooded agricultural soils
1
Institute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Doświadczalna 4, 20-290 Lublin, Poland
2
Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 40b, 20-618 Lublin, Poland
3
Department of Environmental Engineering Institute of Engineering and Technical Sciences Faculty of Exact Sciences and Health Sciences, John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Konstantynów 1 H, 20-708 Lublin, Poland
Final revision date: 2021-01-07
Acceptance date: 2021-01-12
Publication date: 2021-03-15
Corresponding author
Teresa Włodarczyk
Department of Natural Environment Biogeochemistry, Institute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lublin, Poland, Doświadczalna 4`, 20-290, Lublin, Poland
Department of Natural Environment Biogeochemistry, Institute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lublin, Poland, Doświadczalna 4`, 20-290, Lublin, Poland
Int. Agrophys. 2021, 35(1): 61-71
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Specifically, it was tested whether the presence of O2 in the headspace modified the sequence and preference of electron acceptor use under hypoxic conditions after prolonged drought in arable soils. This laboratory study was conducted in order to examine the use of electron acceptors: oxygen (O2), nitrate (NO3¯) and nitrous oxide (N2O), during aerobic and anaerobic respiration (denitrification). Agricultural soils (Typic Dystrudepts) classified as sandy, silty and loamy soils from arable top soils (0-30 cm) were used in the study. The change of oxidation states of different chemical species in the soil affected the use of electron acceptors during denitrification. The use of O2, NO3¯ and net N2O use was gradual and differed greatly among the soils. Furthermore, microorganisms were shown to be able to use all three investigated electron acceptors simultaneously, but with clearly visible preferences. The rate of electron acceptor use per day differentiated the investigated soils into a few different groups. Overall, the results of this study indicated that N2O was a more preferable electron acceptor than NO3¯ when O2 was present in the headspace for the most investigated soils. Moreover, a correlation existed between the final electron acceptor use and particle-size distribution and the native organic C content (Corg). The rate of electron acceptor use per day calculated for O2, NO3¯ and N2O may provide very important information for distinguishing the preference of electron acceptor use during aerobic and nitrate respiration in agroecosystems under hypoxic conditions after prolonged drought for different kinds of electron acceptor.
REFERENCES (36)
1.
Baggs E.M., 2008. A review of stable isotope techniques for N2O source partitioning in soils: Recent progress, remaining challenges and future considerations. Rapid Commun. in Mass Spectrom., 22, 1664-1672. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.34....
2.
Bieganowski A., Witkowska-Walczak B., Gliński J., Sokołowska Z., Sławiński C., Brzezińska M., and Włodarczyk T., 2013. Database of Polish arable mineral soils: a review. Int. Agrophys., 27, 335-350. https://doi.org/10.2478/intag-....
3.
Bonin P.C. and Michotey V.D., 2006. Nitrogen budget in a microbial mat in the Camargue (southern France). Mar. Ecology-Progress Series, 322, 75-84. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps32....
4.
Bouwman A.F., Boumas L.J.M., and Batjes N.H., 2002. Emissions of N2O and NO from fertilized fields: Summary of available measurement data. Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 16, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001gb....
5.
Carter J.P., Hsiao Y.H., Spiro S., and Richardson D.J., 1995. Soil and sediment bacteria capable of aerobic nitrate respiration. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 61, 2852-2858. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.61....
6.
Chapuis-Lardy L., Wrage N., Metay A., Chotte, J-L., and Bernoux M., 2007. Soils, a sink for N2O? A review. Global Change Biol., 13, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365....
7.
Cho C.M., 1982. Oxygen consumption and denitrification kinetics in soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 46, 756-762.
8.
Cho C. M. and Sadkinan L., 1978. Mass spectrometric investigation on denitrification. Can. J. Soil Sci., 58, 443-457.
9.
Dhamole P.B., Nair R.R., D’Souza S.F., and Lele S.S., 2007. Denitrification of high strength nitrate waste. Bioresour. Technol., 98, 247-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bior....
10.
Dinçer A.R. and Kargi F., 2001. Salt inhibition kinetics in nitrification of synthetic saline wastewater. Enzyme Microbial Technol., 28, 661-665. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0141-....
11.
Dodla S.K., Wang J.J., De Laune R.D., and Cook R.L., 2008. Denitrification potential and its relation to organic carbon quality in three coastal wetland soils. Sci. Total Environ., 407, 471-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit....
12.
Gajda A.M., Czyż E.A., and Dexter A.R., 2016. Effects of long-term use of different farming systems on some physical, chemical and microbiological parameters of soil quality. Int. Agrophys., 30, 165-172. https://doi.org/10.1515/intag-....
13.
Glatzel S. and Stahr K., 2001. Methane and nitrous oxide exchange in differently fertilized grassland in southern Germany. Plant Soil, 231, 21-35.
14.
Gliński J. and Stępniewski W., 1985. Soil Aeration and its Role for Plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton FL, USA.
15.
Harrison-Kirk T., Beare M.H., Meenken E.D., and Condron L.M., 2013. Soil organic matter and texture affect responses to dry/wet cycles: Effects on carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide emissions. Soil Biol. Biochem., 57, 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soil....
16.
Hatano R., 2019. Impact of land use change on greenhouse gases emissions in peatland: a review. Int. Agrophys., 33, 167-173. https://doi.org/10.31545/intag....
17.
Johnson L.T., Roye T.V., Edgerton J.M., and Leff L.G., 2012. Manipulation of the dissolved organic carbon pool in an agricultural stream: Responses in microbial community structure, denitrification, and assimilatory nitrogen uptake. Ecosystems, 15, 1027-1038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021....
18.
Kraft B., Strous M., and Tegetmeyer H.E., 2011. Microbial nitrate respiration – Genes, enzymes and environmental distribution. J. Biotechnol., 155, 104-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbio....
19.
Liptzin D., Whendee L., Silver W.L., and Detto M., 2011. Temporal dynamics in soil oxygen and greenhouse gases in two humid tropical forests. Ecosystems, 14, 171-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021....
20.
Öhlinger R., 1995. Methods is soil physics and chemistry. In: Methods in Soil Biology (Eds F. Schiner, R. Öhlinger, E. Kandeler, R. Margesin). Springer – Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, 385-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
21.
Patrick W.H. Jr, Mikkelsen D.S., and Wells B.R., 1985. Plant nutrient behavior in flooded soil Fertilizer Technology and Use. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, USA, https://doi.org/10.2136/1985.f....
22.
Patrick W.H. and Jugsujinda A., 1992. Sequential reduction and oxidation of inorganic nitrogen, manganese, and iron in flooded soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 56, 1071-1073. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1....
23.
Pauleta S.R., Dell’Acqua S., and Moura I., 2013. Nitrous oxide reductase. Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 257, 332-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.....
24.
Peterson M.E., Curtin D., Thomas S., Clough T.J., and Meenken E.D., 2013. Denitrification in vadose zone material amended with dissolved organic matter from topsoil and subsoil. Soil Biol. Biochem., 61, 96-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soil....
25.
Philippot L., Andert J., Jones C. M., Bru D., and Hallin S., 2011. Importance of denitrifiers lacking the genes encoding the nitrous oxide reductase for N2O emissions from soil. Global Change Biol., 17, 1497-1504. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365....
26.
Ponnamporuma F.N., 1972. The chemistry of submerged soils. Advances in Agronomy, 24, 29-96.
27.
Rivett M.O., Buss S.R., Morgan F., Smith J.W.N., and Bemment C.D., 2008. Nitrate attenuation in groundwater: A review of biogeochemical controlling processes. Water Res., 42, 4215-4232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watr....
28.
Robertson L.A. and Kuenen J.G., 1991. Physiology of nitrifying and denitrifying bacteria. In: Microbial Production and Consumption of Greenhouse Gases: Methane, Nitrogen Oxides, and Halomethanes (Eds J.E. Rogers, W.B. Whitman). American Society for Microbiology, Washington DC, USA. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq199....
29.
Ryden J.C., 1983. Denitrification loss from a grassland soil in the field receiving different rates of nitrogen as ammonium nitrate. J. Soil Sci., 34, 355-365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365....
30.
Turn F.T. and Patrick W.H. Jr., 1968. Chemical changes in waterlogged soils as a result of oxygen depletion. In: Int. Congr. Soil Sci. (Ed. J.W. Holmes). Elsevier, 4, Adelaide, New York, USA.
31.
Vor T., Dyckmans J., Loftfield N., Beese F., and Flessa H., 2003. Aeration effects on CO2, N2O and CH4 emission and leachate composition of forest soil. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 166, 39-45. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.2....
32.
Wagner-Riddle C., Thurtell G.W., Kidd G.K., Beauchamp E.G., and Sweetman R., 1997. Estimates of nitrous oxide emission from agricultural fields over 28 months. Can. J. Soil Sci., 77, 135-144 . https://doi.org/10.4141/s96-10....
33.
Włodarczyk T., 2000. Some of aspects of dehydrogenase activity in soils. Int. Agrophys., 14, 341-354.
34.
Włodarczyk T., Stępniewski W., Brzezińska M., and Stępniewska Z., 2004. Nitrate stability in loess soils under anaerobic conditions – laboratory studies. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 167, 693-700. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.2....
35.
Włodarczyk T., Stępniewski W., Brzezińska M., and Majewska U., 2011. Various textured soil as nitrous oxide emitter and consumer. Int. Agrophys., 25, 287-297. https://doi.org/10.31545/intag....
36.
Zaman M. and Nguyen M.L., 2010. Effect of lime or zeolite on N2O and N2 emissions from a pastoral soil treated with urine or nitrate-N fertilizer under field conditions. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 136, 254-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee....
| eISSN: | 2300-8725 |
| ISSN: | 0236-8722 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
