RESEARCH PAPER
Study of the pore structure characteristics of soybean grain piles using image processing technology
,
 
,
 
,
 
,
 
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
College of Civil Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China
 
 
Final revision date: 2023-03-30
 
 
Acceptance date: 2023-04-03
 
 
Publication date: 2023-05-30
 
 
Corresponding author
Guixiang Chen   

College of Civil Engineering, Henan University of Technology, China
 
 
Int. Agrophys. 2023, 37(2): 201-214
 
HIGHLIGHTS
  • The porosity in the grain pile is decreased with increase in the vertical pressure.
  • The pore area and pore diameter decrease gradually with increase in the vertical pressure.
  • The effect of vertical pressure on pore structure parameters was studied.
  • The average fractal dimension of pores increases with increase in the vertical pressure.
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Pore structure is an important factor affecting the airflow distribution in a grain pile, and hence the variation in its structural parameters under different vertical pressures should be studied further. In this study, grain slice imaging and image processing technologies were comprehensively used to study the changes in the number, size, and shape of the pores in soybean grain piles under vertical pressures of 0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, and 300 kPa, and to explore the effects of vertical pressure on the porosity, pore volume, pore diameter, and pore fractal dimension of the grain piles. The results show that the porosity of the grain pile decreased with an increase in the vertical pressure, and the change rate of grain pile porosity was 28% when the vertical pressure was 0-300 kPa. When the vertical pressure increased from 50 to 300 kPa, the grain pile porosity variation increased from 6.49 to 24.33% as compared with the natural state (0 kPa). The pore area and diameter of the grain pile gradually decreased with the increase in vertical pressure. The distribution of the grain pile pore area along the horizontal direction from the side wall to centre showed great differences under different vertical pressures. With an increase in vertical pressure, the proportion of the pore diameter of < 2.5 mm increased, whereas the proportion of the pore diameter of > 2.5 mm decreased. An increase in the vertical pressure will lead to an increase in the grain pile pore fractal dimension. When the vertical pressure was 0-300 kPa, the change rate of the grain pile pore fractal dimension was 10%. The relevant research methods and conclusions drawn in this study may be used to provide theoretical support and a reference source for the airflow distribution and resistance changes in the bulk grain piles.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
 
REFERENCES (53)
1.
ASAE S352.2 APR1988 (R2017), 2017. Moisture measurement-unground grain and seeds. ASAE: St. Joseph, Mich: USA.
 
2.
ASAE D241.4 OCT1992 (R2017ED), 2017. Density, specific gravity, and mass-moisture relationships of grain for storage. ASAE: St. Joseph, Mich, USA.
 
3.
Altuntas E. and Demirtola H., 2007. Effect of moisture content on physical properties of some grain legume seeds. New Zealand J. Crop Hort. Sci., 35(4), 423-433, https://doi.org/10.1080/011406....
 
4.
Amanlou Y. and Zomorodian A.A., 2011. Resistance to air flow across a thin green fig bed. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 13(5), 677-685.
 
5.
Budhathoki S., Lamba J., Srivastava P., Malhotra K.,Way T.R. and Katuwal S., 2022. Using X-ray computed tomography to quantify variability in soil macropore characteristics in pastures. Soil Till. Res., 215, 105194, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stil....
 
6.
Chen G.L., Li F.L., Geng J.Y., Jing P.F. and Si Z.K., 2021. Identification, generation of autoclaved aerated concrete pore structure and simulation of its influence on thermal conductivity. Construction Building Materials, 294, 123572 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb....
 
7.
Chen P., Huang K., Wang F., Xie W., Wei S., and Yang D., 2019. Simulation of heat and mass transfer in a grain pile on the basis of a 2D irregular pore network. Fluid Dynamics Materials Proc., 15(4), 367-389, https://doi.org/10.32604/fdmp.....
 
8.
Cheng X.D., Zhang Q., Shi C.X., and Yan X.J., 2017. Model for the prediction of grain density and pressure distribution in hopper-bottom silos. Biosys. Eng., 163, 159-166, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios....
 
9.
Cheng X.D., Zhang Q., Yan X.J., and Shi C.X., 2015. Compressibility and equivalent bulk modulus of shelled corn. Biosystems Engineering, 140, 91-97, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios....
 
10.
Chung D.S., Maghirang R.G., Kim Y.S., and Kim M.S., 2001. Effects of moisture and fine material on static pressure drops in a bed of grain sorghum and rough rice. Trans. ASAE, 44(2), 331-336, https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.....
 
11.
Florio B.J., Fawell P.D., and Small M., 2019. The use of the perimeter-area method to calculate the fractal dimension of aggregates. Powder Technol., 343, 551-559, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powt....
 
12.
Fu J. and Yu Y., 2019. Experimental study on pore characteristics and fractal dimension calculation of pore structure of aerated concrete block. Advances Civil Eng., 8043248, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8....
 
13.
Ghodki B.M., Patel M., Namdeo R., and Carpenter G., 2019. Calibration of discrete element model parameters: soybeans. Computational Particle Mechanics, 6(1), 3-10, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571....
 
14.
Haque E., 2011. Void fraction as a function of depth and pressure drops of packed beds of porous media formed by granular materials. Trans. ASABE, 54(6), 2239-2243, https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.....
 
15.
Hilton J.E., Mason L.R., and Cleary P.W., 2010. Dynamics of gas-solid fluidised beds with non-spherical particle geometry. Chem. Eng. Sci., 65(5), 1584-1596, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.....
 
16.
Hu W.L., Jiang Y., Chen D.Y., Lin Y.S., Han Q., and Cui Y.F., 2018. Impact of pore geometry and water saturation on gas effective diffusion coefficient in soil. Applied Sciences-Basel, 8(11), https://doi.org/10.3390/app811....
 
17.
Huang K., Wang X., Liu X., Wang X., and Yang D., 2013. Construction of Three-Dimensional Pore Network in Bulk Grain. Drying Technol., 31(15), 1871-1878, https://doi.org/10.1080/073739....
 
18.
Kang S.H., Hong S.G., and Moon J., 2018. The effect of superabsorbent polymer on various scale of pore structure in ultra-high performance concrete. Construction Building Materials, 172, 29-40, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb....
 
19.
Khatchatourian O.A. and Savicki D.L., 2004. Mathematical modelling of airflow in an aerated soya bean store under non-uniform conditions. Biosystems Eng., 88(2), 201-211, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios....
 
20.
Klerk A. de, 2003. Voidage variation in packed beds at small column to particle diameter ratio. AIChE J., 49(8), 2022-2029, https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.69....
 
21.
Kocabiyik H., Aktas T., and Kayisoglu B., 2004. Porosity rate of some kernel crops. J. Agronomy, 3(2), 76-80, https://doi.org/10.3923/ja.200....
 
22.
Lawrence J. and Maier D.E., 2012. Prediction of temperature distributions in peaked, leveled and inverted cone grain mass configurations during aeration of corn. Appl. Eng. Agric., 28(5), 685-692, https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.....
 
23.
Lawrence J., Maier D.E., and Stroshine R.L., 2013. Three-dimensional transient heat, mass, momentum, and species transfer in the stored grain ecosystem: part I. model development and evaluation. Trans. ASABE, 56(1), 179-188, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prot....
 
24.
Liu B.Q., Zhang X.H., Wang L.G., and Hong H., 2008. Fluidization of non-spherical particles: sphericity, zingg factor and other fluidization parameters. Particuology, 6(2), 125-129, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpar....
 
25.
Liu C.S., Chen G.X., Zhou Y., Yuel L.F., and Liu W.L., 2022a. Investigation on compression and mildew of mixed and separated maize. Food Sci. Nutr., https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2....
 
26.
Liu C.S., Chen G.X., Zhou Y., Zheng D.Q., and Zhang Z.J., 2022b. Element tests and simulation of effects of vertical pressure on compression and mildew of wheat. Computers Electronics Agric., 203, 107447, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
 
27.
Liu C.S., Zhou Y., Chen G.X., Zheng D.Q. and Yue L.F., 2022c. Compression and fungal heat production in maize bulk considering kernel breakage. Applied Sciences-Basel, 12(10), 4870, https://doi.org/10.3390/app121....
 
28.
Liu W.L., Chen G.X., Liu C.S., Zheng D.Q., and Ge M.M., 2022d. Experimental and numerical study of pressure drop characteristics of soybean grain under vertical pressure. Appl. Sciences-Basel, 12(14), 6830, https://doi.org/10.3390/app121....
 
29.
Mohapatra D., Kumar S., Kotwaliwale N., and Singh K.K., 2017. Critical factors responsible for fungi growth in stored food grains and non-Chemical approaches for their control. Industrial Crops Products, 108, 162-182, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indc....
 
30.
Nalladurai K., Alagusundaram K., and Gayathri P., 2002. PH-postharvest technology: airflow resistance of paddy and its byproducts. Biosys. Eng., 83(1), 67-75, https://doi.org/https://doi.or....
 
31.
Narendran R.B., Jian F.J., Jayas D.S., Fields P.G., and White N.D.G., 2019. Segregation of canola, kidney bean, and soybean in wheat bulks during bin loading. Powder Technol., 344, 307-313, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powt....
 
32.
Neethirajan S., Jayas D.S., White Ndg and Zhang H., 2008. Investigation of 3D geometry of bulk wheat and pea pores using x-ray computed tomography images. Computers Electronics Agric., 63(2), 104-111, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
 
33.
Neethirajan S., Karunakaran C., Jayas D.S., and White Ndg, 2006. X-ray Computed Tomography Image Analysis to explain the Airflow Resistance Differences in Grain Bulks. Biosys. Eng., 94(4), 545-555, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios....
 
34.
Neethirajan S. and Jayas D.S., 2007. Analysis of pore network in three-dimensional (3D) grain bulks using x-ray CT images. Transport in Porous Media, 73(3), 319-332, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242....
 
35.
Nourmohamadi-Moghadami A., Zare D., Singh C.B., and Stroshine R.L., 2020a. Filling of a grain silo. Part 1: Investigation of fine material distribution in a small scale centre-filled silo. Biosystems Engineering, 191, 145-156, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios....
 
36.
Nourmohamadi-Moghadami A., Zare D., Stroshine R.L., and Kamfiroozi S., 2020b. Filling of a grain silo. Part 2: A new filling method for uniform distribution of fines in a small scale silo. Biosys. Eng., 191, 157-167, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios....
 
37.
Nwaizu C. and Zhang Q., 2021. Computational modeling of heterogenous pore structure and airflow distribution in grain aeration system. Computers Electronics Agric., 188, 106315, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
 
38.
Olatunde G., Atungulu G.G., and Sadaka S., 2016. CFD modeling of air flow distribution in rice bin storage system with different grain mass configurations. Biosys. Eng., 151, 286-297, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios....
 
39.
Panigrahi S.S., Singh C.B., and Fielke J., 2020. CFD modelling of physical velocity and anisotropic resistance components in a peaked stored grain with aeration ducting systems. Computers Electronics Agric., 179, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comp....
 
40.
Rabbi S.M.F., Tighe M.K., Flavel R.J., Kaiser B.N., Guppy C.N., Zhang X.X., and Young I.M., 2018. Plant roots redesign the rhizosphere to alter the three-dimensional physical architecture and water dynamics. New Phytologist, 219(2), 542-550, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15....
 
41.
Robertson E.A.G., and Campbell D.J., 1997. Simple, low-cost image analysis of soil pore structure. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 68(4), 291-296, https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1....
 
42.
Shedd C.K., 1951. Some new data on resistance of grains to airflow. Agric. Eng., 32(9), 493-495.
 
43.
Thompson S.A. and Ross I.J., 1983. Compressibility and frictional coefficients of wheat. Trans. ASAE, 26(4), 1171-1176, https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.....
 
44.
Tian W. and Han N., 2018. Pore characteristics (> 0.1 mm) of non-air entrained concrete destroyed by freeze-thaw cycles based on CT scanning and 3D printing. Cold Regions Science Technol., 151, 314-322, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cold....
 
45.
Tiusanen M., Jokiniemi J., and Hautala M.I., 2013. Grain dryer temperature optimisation with simulation and a test dryer. IFAC Proc. Volumes, 46(18), 12-17, https://doi.org/https://doi.or....
 
46.
Vicente M.A., Gonzalez D.C., and Minguez J., 2019. Recent advances in the use of computed tomography in concrete technology and other engineering fields. Micron, 118, 22-34, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micr....
 
47.
Vicente M.A., Gonzalez D.C., Minguez J., Tarifa M.A., Ruiz G., and Hindi R., 2018. Influence of the pore morphology of high strength concrete on its fatigue life. Int. J. Fatigue, 112, 106-116, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfa....
 
48.
Sobieski W., Zhang Q., and Liu C., 2012. Predicting tortuosity for airflow through porous beds consisting of randomly packed spherical particles. Transport in Porous Media, 93(3), 431-451, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242....
 
49.
Wu Z.D., Zhang Q., Yin J., Wang X.M., Zhang Z.J., Wu W.F., and Li F.J., 2020. Interactions of mutiple biological fields in stored grain ecosystems. Sci. Reports, 10(1), 9302, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598....
 
50.
Yuan J., Wu Y., and Zhang J.K., 2018. Characterization of air voids and frost resistance of concrete based on industrial computerized tomographical technology. Construction Building Materials, 168, 975-983, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb....
 
51.
Yuan Y., Tan, L., Zhao Z., Xu Y., Zhao Y., and Yuan Y., 2016. Multiscale and multilayer structural modeling and simulation on drying of grain packing porous media. Drying Technol., 34(14), 1664-1676, https://doi.org/10.1080/073739....
 
52.
Yue R. and Zhang Q., 2017a. A pore-scale model for quantifying airflow paths through grain bulks. Trans. ASABE, 60(3), 965-972, https://doi.org/https://doi.or....
 
53.
Yue R. and Zhang Q., 2017b. A pore-scale model for predicting resistance to airflow in bulk grain. Biosystems Eng., 155, 142-151, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios....
 
eISSN:2300-8725
ISSN:0236-8722
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top