RESEARCH PAPER
Contribution of diffusional and non-diffusional limitations to the midday depression of photosynthesis which varies dynamically even under constant environmental conditions
 
More details
Hide details
1
Graduate School of Bioresource and Bioenvironment Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
2
Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan
3
IoP Collaborative Creation Centre, Kochi University, Nankoku, 783-8502, Japan
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Daisuke Yasutake   

Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishi-ku, 819-0395, Fukuoka, Japan
Final revision date: 2022-06-09
Acceptance date: 2022-06-15
Publication date: 2022-08-08
 
Int. Agrophys. 2022, 36(3): 207–212
 
HIGHLIGHTS
  • Midday depression of photosynthesis was analyzed
  • Midday depression occurred even under constant environment
  • Contribution of diffusional/non-diffusional limitations changed dynamically
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Both diffusional and non-diffusional limitation factors and their contribution to the phenomenon known as midday depression were studied; a decrease in photosynthesis due to environmental stress. Measurements of leaf gas exchange (transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, photosynthetic rate) and related parameters (intercellular CO2 concentration, maximum carboxylation, diffusional limitation index, leaf water potential) were determined over time from cucumber plants under constant environmental conditions. The experiment may be divided into three periods. Period 1 occurred when both photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance increased, period 2 occurred when photosynthetic rate decreased but stomatal conductance remained constant, period 3 occurred with the decrease in both photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance. Photosynthetic rate increased immediately, post-illumination, and reached its maximum value during period 1, then it decreased to half this value for the remainder of the experiment, indicating that a midday depression had occurred. During period 2, diffusional limitation index was around 50% and then increased while maximum carboxylation sharply decreased, suggesting the existence of both non-diffusional and diffusional limitations. In period 3, stomatal conductance decreased due to decreasing leaf water potential, and diffusional limitation index increased, suggesting that diffusional limitation was dominant at this stage. Thus, it was found that there are multiple dominant factors in midday depression, and that these factors are dynamic even under constant environmental conditions.
FUNDING
This work was mainly supported by the Grant in Aid for Scientific Research (No. 21H02318, 2021-2023) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, and partially supported by the Cabinet Office Grant in Aid, the Advanced Next-Generation Greenhouse Horticulture by IoP (Internet of Plants), Japan.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
 
REFERENCES (24)
1.
Araya T., Noguchi K., and Terashima I., 2006. Effects of carbohydrate accumulation on photosynthesis differ between sink and source leaves of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Plant Cell Physiol., 47, 644-652. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pc....
 
2.
Bernacchi C.J., Singsaas E.L., Pimentel C., Portis A.R., and Long S.P., 2001. Improved temperature response functions for models of Rubisco-limited photosynthesis. Plant, Cell Environ., 24, 253-259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365....
 
3.
Farquhar G.D., von Caemmerer S., and Berry J.A., 1980. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta, 149, 78-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0038....
 
4.
Flexas J., Ribas-Carbó M., Diaz-Espejo A., Galmés J., and Medrano H., 2008. Mesophyll conductance to CO2: Current knowledge and future prospects. Plant, Cell Environ., 31, 602-621. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365....
 
5.
Genty B., Briantais J.M., and Baker N.R., 1989. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta – General Subjects, 990, 87-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-....
 
6.
Grassi G., and Magnani F., 2005. Stomatal, mesophyll conductance and biochemical limitations to photosynthesis as affected by drought and leaf ontogeny in ash and oak trees. Plant, Cell Environ., 28, 834-849. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365....
 
7.
He J., Austin P. T., Nichols M. A., and Lee S. K., 2007. Elevated root-zone CO2 protects lettuce plants from midday depression of photosynthesis. Environ. Exp. Botany, 61, 94-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enve....
 
8.
Hidaka K., Dan K., Miyoshi Y., Imamura H., Takayama T., Kitano M., Sameshima K., and Okimura M., 2016. Twofold increase in strawberry productivity by integration of environmental control and movable beds in a large-scale greenhouse. Environ. Control Biol., 54, 79-92. https://doi.org/10.2525/ecb.54....
 
9.
Hirasawa T., Ishihara K., Iida Y., 1989. Dominant factors in reduction of photosynthetic rate affected by air humidity and leaf water potential in rice plants. Japanese J. Crop Sci., 58, 383-389. https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.58....
 
10.
Hirasawa T., and Hsiao T.C., 1999. Some characteristics of reduced leaf photosynthesis at midday depression in maze growing in the field. Field Crop Res., 62, 53-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-....
 
11.
Hu M.J., Guo Y.P., Shen Y.G., Guo D.P., and Li D.Y., 2009. Midday depression of photosynthesis and effects of mist spray in citrus. Annals Appl. Biol., 154, 143-155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744....
 
12.
Jones H.G., 2014. Plants and Microclimate: A Quantitative Approach to Environmental Plant Physiology. New York, Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978....
 
13.
Kauwe M.G., Lin Y.S., Wright I.J., Medlyin B.E., Crous K.Y., Ellsworth D.S., and Domingues T.F., 2016. A test of the „one-point method” for estimating maximum carboxylation capacity from field-measured, light-saturated photosynthesis. New Phytologist, 210, 1130-1144. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13....
 
14.
Kitano M., and Eguchi H., 1993. Dynamic analyses of water relations and leaf growth in cucumber plants under midday water deficit. Biotronics, 22, 73-85.
 
15.
Liu X., and Huang B., 2008. Photosynthetic acclimation to high temperatures associated with heat tolerance in creeping bentgrass. J. Plant Physiol., 165, 1947-1953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplp....
 
16.
Loucos K.E., Simonin K.A., and Barbour M.M., 2017. Leaf hydraulic conductance and mesophyll conductance are not closely related within a single species. Plant Cell Environ., 40, 203-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12....
 
17.
McAusland L., Vialet-Chabrabd S., Davey P., Baker N.R., Brendel O., and Lawson T., 2016. Effects of kinetics of light-induced stomatal responses on photosynthesis and water-use efficiency. New Phytologist, 211, 1290-1220. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14....
 
18.
Muraoka H., Tang Y., Terashima I., Koizumi H., and Washitani I., 2000. Contributions of diffusional limitation, photoinhibition and photorespiration to midday depression of photosynthesis in Arisaema heterophyllum in natural high light. Plant, Cell Environ., 23, 235-250. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365....
 
19.
Raschke K., and Resemann A., 1986. The midday depression of CO2 assimilation in leaves of Arbutus unedo L.: diurnal changes in photosynthetic capacity related to changes in temperature and humidity. Planta, 168, 546-558. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0039....
 
20.
Roessler P.G. and Monson R.K., 1985. Midday depression in net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance in Yucca glauca. Oecologia, 67, 380-387. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0038....
 
21.
von Caemmerer S., and Evans J.R., 2015. Temperature responses of mesophyll conductance differ greatly between species. Plant, Cell Environ., 38. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12....
 
22.
Yabuki K., 1963. A consideration on the midday depression of photosynthesis. J. Agric. Meteorol., 19, 11-14. https://doi.org/10.2480/agrmet....
 
23.
Yokoyama G., Yasutake D., and Kitano M., 2018. A preliminary experiment on the effects of leaf wetting on gas exchange in tomato leaves. Environ. Control Biol., 56, 13-16. https://doi.org/10.2525/ecb.56....
 
24.
Yoneda A., Yasutake D., Hidaka K., Muztahidin N.I., Miyoshi Y., Kitano M., and Okayasu T., 2020. Effects of supplemental lighting during the period of rapid fruit development on the growth, yield, and energy use efficiency in strawberry plant production. Int. Agrophys., 34, 233-239. https://doi.org/10.31545/intag....
 
eISSN:2300-8725
ISSN:0236-8722