Laboratory determination of soil water retentions and hydraulic conductivity curves requires different techniques, depending on the number of data points needed. An important consideration in technique selection is soil sampling, particularly the distinction between disturbed and undisturbed samples, as laboratory methods can differ significantly for each kind of soil sample. This work addressed the increasing interest within soil physics in using methodologies that cover a wide range of water content and suction to determine soil hydraulic properties accurately. Achieving soil samples representative of physical processes is challenging due to the time required for measurements and the combination of techniques necessary to characterize soil water retention and hydraulic conductivity curves. A detailed workflow in-tandem for soil hydraulic curve measurements is presented, comprising more than 4 500 measurements to describe both curves from saturation to dryness. To enhance reproducibility and reduce uncertainty in laboratory measurement, this work offers ten best practice recommendations focused on sample preparation, instrument handling, and data management. This work aims to contribute to improved methodologies in soil physics laboratories and promote standardized practices. This work also contributes to advancing the reliability and accuracy of soil hydraulic properties assessment, thereby supporting improved research and application in soil science.
FUNDING
This work was supported by funding from the National Agency for Research and Development, Chile, grant ANID/FONDECYT/REGULAR 1161045 and 1191166.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Declaration of competing interest. The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
REFERENCES(31)
1.
Acevedo, S.E., Contreras, C.P., Ávila, C.J., Bonilla, C.A., 2021. Testing the integral suspension pressure method for soil particle size analysis across a range of soil organic matter contents. Int. Agrophys. 35, 357-363, https://doi.org/10.31545/intag....
Acevedo, S.E., Martínez, S.I., Contreras, C.P., Bonilla, C.A., 2023. Effect of data availability and pedotransfer estimates on water flow modelling in wildfire-affected soils. J. Hydrol. 617, 128919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhyd....
Araya, S.N., Mitchell, J.P., Hopmans, J.W., Ghezzehei, T.A., 2022. Long-term impact of cover crop and reduced disturbancetillage on soil pore size distribution and soil water storage. Soil 8, 177-198. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8....
Baker, F.G., Bouma, J., 1976. Variability of hydraulic conductivity in two subsurface horizons of two silt loam soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 40, 219-222.
Fields, J.S., Owen, J.S., Zhang, L., and Fonteno, W.C. 2016. Use of the evaporative method for determination of soilless substrate moisture characteristic curves. Scientia Hortic. 211, 102-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scie....
Ikoyi, I., Schmalenberger, A., 2021. Design and construction of repacked soil columns for measuring solute transport, plant growth and soil biota. Bio-protocol 11(2): 3884. https://doi.org/10.21769/BioPr....
Guillaume, B., Boukbida, H.A., Bakker, G., Bieganowski, A., Brostaux, Y., Cornelis, W., et al., 2023. Reproducibility of the wet part of the soil water retention curve: a European interlaboratory comparison. Soil 9: 365-379. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9....
Haghverdi, A., Öztürk, H.S., Durner, W., 2018. Measurement and estimation of the soil water retention curve using the evaporation method and the pseudo continuous pedotransfer function. J. Hydrol. 563, 251-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhyd....
Hohenbrink, T.L., Jackisch, C., Durner, W., Germer, K., Iden, S.C., Kreiselmeier, J., et al., 2023. Soil water retention and hydraulic conductivity measured in a wide saturation range. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 15, 4417-4432. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-1....
Inforsato, L., Iden, S., Durner, W., Peters, A., De Jong Van Lier, Q., 2023. Improved calculation of soil hydraulic conductivity with the simplified evaporation method. Vadose Zone J. 22:e20267. https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.2....
Jiang, R., Li, T., Liu, D., Fu, Q., Hou, R., Li, Q., et al., 2021. Soil infiltration characteristics and pore distribution under freezing-thawing conditions. Cryosphere 15, 2133-2146. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-....
Kirsten, B., Iden, S.C., Durner, W., 2019. Determination of the Soil water retention curve around the wilting point: optimized protocol for the dewpoint method. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 83, 288-299. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2....
Lewis, J., Sjöstrom, J., 2010. Optimizing the experimental design of soil columns in saturated and unsaturated transport experiments. J. Contaminant Hydrol. 115, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcon....
Lipovetsky, T., Zhuang, L., Teixeira, W.G., Boyd, A., May Pontedeiro, E., Moriconi, L., et al., 2020. HYPROP measurements of the unsaturated hydraulic properties of a carbonate rock sample. J. Hydrol. 591, 125706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhyd....
Minasny, B., McBratney, A.B., 2018. Limited effect of organic matter on soil available water capacity. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 69, 39-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.1....
Peters, A., Durner, W., 2008. Simplified evaporation method for determining soil hydraulic properties. J. Hydrol. 356, 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhyd....
Peters, A., Iden, S.C., Durner, W., 2015. Revisiting the simplified evaporation method: Identification of hydraulic functions considering vapor, film and corner flow. J. Hydrol. 527, 531-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhyd....
Plummer, M.A., Hull, L.C., Fox, D.T., 2004. Transport of Carbon-14 in a large unsaturated soil column. Vadose Zone J. 3, 109-121. https://doi.org/10.2113/3.1.10....
Reading, L.P., Lockington, D.A., Bristow, K.L., Baumgartl, T., 2015. Are we getting accurate measurements of Ksat for sodic clay soils? Agric. Water Manag. 158, 120-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwa....
Schelle, H., Heise, L., Jänicke, K., Durner, W., 2013. Water retention characteristics of soils over the whole moisture range: a comparison of laboratory methods: Water retention characteristics. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 64, 814-821. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.1....
Shokrana, M.S.B., Ghane, E., 2020. Measurement of soil water characteristic curve using HYPROP2. MethodsX 7, 100840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.....
siccation cracking on the evaporation process of a Luvisol – from a small-scale experimental and numerical approach. Soil Till. Res. 193, 142-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stil....
Volk, E., Iden, S.C., Furman, A., Durner, W., Rosenzweig, R., 2016. Biofilm effect on soil hydraulic properties: Experimental investigation using soil‐grown real biofilm. Water Resour. Res. 52, 5813-5828. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR....
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.