Detection of physical hazards in soil profiles using quantitative soil physical quality assessment in the Pannonian basin, Eastern Austria
Thomas Weninger 1  
,   Edith Kamptner 1  
,   Tomas Dostal 2  
,   Adelheid Spiegel 3  
,   Peter Strauss 1  
More details
Hide details
Institute for Land and Water Management, Federal Agency of Water Management, Pollnbergstraße 1, 3252 Petzenkirchen, Austria
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department of Landscape Water Conservation, Czech Technical University Prague, Thákurova 7, 16629 Prague 6, Czech Republic
Institute for Soil Health and Plant Nutrition, Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety, Spargelfeldstraße 191, 1220 Vienna, Austria
Thomas Weninger   

Institute for Land and Water Management, Federal Agency of Water Management, Pollnbergstraße 1, 3252, Petzenkirchen, Austria
Final revision date: 2020-11-02
Acceptance date: 2020-11-13
Publication date: 2020-12-03
Int. Agrophys. 2020, 34(4): 463–471
Reliable estimations of soil physical quality provide valuable information for the evaluation and advancement of agricultural soil management strategies. In the agriculturally highly productive Pannonian basin in Eastern Austria, little emphasis has been placed on the determination of soil physical quality and corresponding soil degradation risks. Nevertheless, ongoing climate change, especially prolonged drought periods and higher rainfall intensity, will raise the need for appropriate soil management strategies. Soil physical quality was therefore assessed in nine soil profiles in a long-term tillage experiment which has been in operation since 1988 in Eastern Austria. Soil samples from depths of between 2 and 37 cm and under three different tillage systems (conventional, reduced and minimal tillage) were analysed for various indicators of soil physical quality. The resulting classifications of soil physical quality in the different profiles were compared qualitatively and quantitatively together with an estimation concerning the representativeness of the soil physical quality indicators used. The outcomes showed severe soil compaction under all tillage treatments and slight improvements in soil physical quality marginally above the working depth for the different treatments. Additionally, conversion to conservation tillage led to less pronounced improvements in soil physical quality under Pannonian conditions than have been reported in more humid climates.
Abdollahi L., Munkholm L.J., and Garbout A., 2013. Tillage system and cover crop effects on soil quality: II. Pore characteristics. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 78(1), 271-279.
Armindo R.A. and Wendroth O., 2016. Physical soil structure evaluation based on hydraulic energy functions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 80, 1167-1180.
Armindo R.A. and Wendroth O., 2019. Alternative approach to calculate soil hydraulic-energy-indices and – functions. Geoderma, 355, 113903.
Assouline S. and Or D., 2014. The concept of field capacity revisited: Defining intrinsic static and dynamic criteria for soil internal drainage dynamics. Water Resour. Res., 50, 4787-4802.
Bacher M.G., Schmidt O., Bondi G., Creamer R., and Fenton O., 2019. Comparison of soil physical quality indicators using direct and indirect data inputs derived from a combination of in-situ and ex-situ methods. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 83, 5-17.
Bottinelli N., Menasseri-Aubry S., Cluzeau D., and Hallaire V., 2013. Response of soil structure and hydraulic conductivity to reduced tillage and animal manure in a temperate loamy soil. Soil Use Manag., 29, 401-409.
Castellini M. and Ventrella D., 2012. Impact of conventional and minimum tillage on soil hydraulic conductivity in typical cropping system in Southern Italy. Soil Till. Res., 124, 47-56.
Castellini M., Stellacci A.M., Barca E., and Iovino M., 2019. Application of multivariate analysis techniques for selecting soil physical quality indicators: A case study in long-term field experiments in Apulia (Southern Italy). Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 83, 707-720.
Dane J.H. and Topp C.G. (Eds), 2002. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 4 Physical Methods. SSSA Book Ser. 5.4. SSSA, Madison, WI.
de Jong van Lier Q., 2017. Field capacity, a valid upper limit of crop available water? Agric. Water Manag., 193, 214-220.
Dexter A.R. and Czyż E.A., 2007. Application of S-theory in the study of soil physical degradation and its consequences. Land Degrad. Develop., 18, 369-381.
Fernández-Ugalde O., Virto I., Bescansa P., Imaz M.J., Enrique A., and Karlen D.L., 2009. No-tillage improvement of soil physical quality in calcareous, degradation-prone, semiarid soils. Soil Till. Res., 106, 29-35.
Iovino M., Castellini M., Bagarello V., and Giordano G., 2016. Using static and dynamic indicators to evaluate soil physical quality in a sicilian area. Land Degrad. Develop., 27, 200-210.
Kahlon M.S., Lal R., and Ann-Varughese M., 2013. Twenty two years of tillage and mulching impacts on soil physical characteristics and carbon sequestration in Central Ohio. Soil Till. Res., 126, 151-158.
Koureh H.K., Asgarzadeh H., Mosaddeghi M.R., and Khodaverdiloo H., 2020. Critical values of soil physical quality indicators based on vegetative growth characteristics of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 20, 493-506.
Kay B.D. and VandenBygaart A.J., 2002. Conservation tillage and depth stratification of porosity and soil organic matter. Soil Till. Res., 66, 107-118.
Li Y., Li Z., Cui S., Jagadamma S., and Zhang Q., 2019. Residue retention and minimum tillage improve physical environment of the soil in croplands: A global meta-analysis. Soil Till. Res., 194, 104292.
Loveland P. and Webb J., 2003. Is there a critical level of organic matter in the agricultural soils of temperate regions: a review. Soil Till. Res., 70, 1-18.
Lozano L.A., Soracco C.G., Villarreal R., Ressia J.M., Sarli G.O., and Filgueira R.R., 2019. Soil physical quality and soybean yield as affected by chiseling and subsoiling of a no-till soil. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Solo, v40:e0150160.
McKenzie B.M., Tisdall J.M., and Vance W.H., 2011. Soil physical quality. In: Encyclopedia of Agrophysics. (Eds J. Gliński, J. Horabik, J. Lipiec). Encyclopedia of Earth Science Series, Springer, Dordrecht, NED.
Merante P., Dibari C., Ferrise R., Sánchet B., Iglesias A., Lesschen J.P., Kuikman P., Yeluripati J., Smith P., and Bindi M., 2017. Adopting soil organic carbon management practices in soils of varying quality: Implications and perspectives in Europe. Soil Till. Res., 165, 95-106.
Moreno F., Pelegrín F., Fernández J.E., and Murillo J.M., 1996. Soil physical properties, water depletion and crop development under traditional and conservation tillage in southern Spain. Soil Till. Res., 41, 25-42.
Olesen J.E., Trnka M., Kersebaum K.C., Skjelvag A.O., Seguin B., Peltonen-Sainio P., Rossi F., Kozyra J., and Micale F., 2011. Impacts and adaptation of European crop production systems to climate change. Eur. J. Agr., 34(2), 96-112.
Parvin N., Parvage M.M., and Etana A., 2014. Effect of mouldboard ploughing and shallow tillage on sub-soil physical properties and crop performance. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 60, 1-7.
Piccoli I., Furlan L., Lazzaro B., and Morari F., 2020. Examining conservation agriculture soil profiles: Outcomes from northeastern Italian silty soils combinig indirect geophysical and direct assessment methods. Eur. J. Soil Sci., 71(6).
Rasmussen K.J., 1999. Impact of ploughless soil tillage on yield and soil quality: A Scandinavian Review. Soil Till. Res., 53, 3-14.
Reynolds W.D., Drury C.F., Yang X.M., Fox C.A., Tan C.S., and Zhang T.Q., 2007. Land management effects on the near-surface physical quality of a clay loam soil. Soil Till. Res., 96, 316-330.
Reynolds W.D., Drury C.F., Tan C.S., Fox C.A., and Yang X.M., 2009. Use of indicators and pore volume function characteristics to quantify soil physical quality. Geoderma, 152, 252-263.
Sandén T., Spiegel H., Stüger H.-P., Schlatter N., Haslmayr H.-P., Zavattaro L., Grignani C., Bechini L., D’Hose T., Molendijk L., Pecio A., Jarosz Z., Guzmán G., Vanderlinden K., Giráldez J.V., Mallast J., and ten Berge H., 2018. European long-term field experiments: knowledge gained about alternative management practices. Soil Use Manag., 34(2), 167-176.
Schlüter S., Großmann C., Diel J., Wu G.-M., Tischer S., Deubel A., and Rücknagel J., 2018. Long-term effects of conventional and reduced tillage on soil structure, soil ecological and soil hydraulic properties. Geoderma, 332, 10-19.
Spiegel H., Dersch G., Hösch J., and Baumgarten A., 2007. Tillage effects on soil organic carbon and nutrient availability in a long-term field experiment in Austria. Die Bodenkultur, 58, 1-4.
Thaler S., Eitzinger J., Trnka M., and Dubrovsky M., 2012. Impacts of climate change and alternative adaptation options on winter wheat yield and water productivity in a dry climate in Central Europe. J. Agr. Sci., 150, 537-555.
Turek M.E., Armindo R.A., Wendroth O., and Dos Santos I., 2019. Criteria for the estimation of field capacity and their implications for the bucket type model. Eur. J. Soil Sci., 70, 278-290.
Twarakavi N.K.C., Sakai M., and Simunek J., 2009. An objective analysis of the dynamic nature of field capacity. Water Resour. Res., 45, 1-9.
van Genuchten M.Th., 1980. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44, 892-898.
Weninger T., Kreiselmeier J., Chandrasekhar P., Julich S., Feger K.-H., Schwärzel K., Bodner G., and Schwen A., 2019. Effects of tillage intensity on pore system and physical quality of silt-textured soils detected by multiple methods. Soil Res., 57, 703-711.