Effects of supplemental lighting during the period of rapid fruit development on the growth, yield, and energy use efficiency in strawberry plant production
More details
Hide details
Graduate School of Bioresource and Bioenvironmental Sciences, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka, 819-0395, Japan
Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
Kyushu Okinawa Agricultural Research Centre, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, 1823-1 Miimachi, Kurume, Fukuoka 839-0851, Japan
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Jl. Raya Jakarta km.04, Serang, 42124, Indonesia
Indonesia Centre of Excellence for Food Security, University of Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Jl. Raya Jakarta km.04, Serang, 42124, Indonesia
National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, 1233 Watanukimachi, Takasaki, Gunma 370-1292, Japan
Daisuke Yasutake   

Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishi-ku, 819-0395, Fukuoka, Japan
Final revision date: 2020-01-23
Acceptance date: 2020-01-29
Publication date: 2020-03-31
Int. Agrophys. 2020, 34(2): 233–239
Supplemental lighting techniques in greenhouses can increase plant growth and yield but require substantial amounts of energy. We proposed the use of energy-saving supplemental lighting, which was applied during rapid fruit development when the transport of photosynthetic products into the fruit was active. We measured the physiological responses (photosynthesis, growth, yield) of the strawberry plants with single fruit truss, wherein the following 3 treatments were made: plants were cultivated with no supplemental lighting (control), supplemental lighting throughout the experimental period (normal-light), and supplemental lighting during rapid fruit development (short-light). The period of rapid fruit development corresponded to 33% of the experimental period, and the cumulative light intensity for the short-light treatment was half of that for the normal-light treatment, and twice that of the control treatment. Consequently, the leaf area and dry weight of the plant body were significantly increased following normal-light and short-light treatments compared with the control treatment. The yield for the short-light treatment was also increased and nearly equal to that of the normal-light treatment but no significance to the control treatment. However, the energy use efficiency of the short-light was improved 1.5-fold compared to the normal-light treatment. Thus, shortening the period of supplemental lighting in accordance with the characteristics of fruit development is potentially effective.
Andre G., Hui-lian Xu, and Mohammed D., 1996. Effects of supplemental lighting and fruit thinning on fruit yield and source-sink relations of greenhouse tomato plants. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 65(3): 595-601.
Araki T., Kitano M., and Eguchi H., 2000. Dynamics of fruit growth and photo-assimilate translocation in tomato plant (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) under controlled environment. Acta Hortic., 534:85-92.
Bakker J.C., Adams S.R., Boulard T., and Montero J.I., 2008. Innovative technologies for an efficient use of energy. Acta Hortic., 801(1): 49-62.
Demers D.A., Dorais M., Wien C.H., Gosselin A., 1998. Effect of supplemental light duration on greenhouse tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) plants and fruit yields. Sci. Hortic., 74:295-306.
Heuvelink E., 2005. Tomatoes: crop production science in horticulture. Oxford, CAB International.
Hidaka K., Dan K., Imamura H., Miyoshi Y., Takayama T., Sameshima K., Kitano M., and Okimura M., 2013. Effect of supplemental lighting from different light sources on growth and yield of strawberry. Environ. Control Biol., 51(1): 41-47.
Hidaka K., Dan K., Imamura H., Takayama T., Sameshima K., Okimura M., 2015. Variety comparison of effect of supplemental lighting with LED on growth and yield in forcing culture of strawberry. Environ. Control Biol., 53(3): 135-143.
Hidaka K., Dan K., Miyoshi Y., Imamura H., Takayama T., Kitano M., Sameshima K., and Okimura M., 2016. Twofold increase in strawberry productivity by integration of environmental control and movable beds in a large-scale greenhouse. Environ. Control Biol., 54(2): 79-92.
Hidaka K., Okamoto A., Araki T., Miyoshi Y., Dan K., Imamura H., Kitano M., Sameshima K., and Okimura M., 2014. Effect of photoperiod of supplemental lighting with light-emitting diodes on growth and yield of strawberry. Environ. Control Biol., 52(2):63-71.
Kassai T., Mosoni P., Patyi R., and Dénes F., 2002. Investigation of the dynamics of fruit growth in two strawberry varieties. Acta Hortic., 567:377-379.
Li B., Han Y., and Zhao Y., 2013. Sucrose functions as a signal involved in the regulation of strawberry fruit development and ripening. New Phytol., 198(2): 453-465.
Li Y., Sakiyama R., Maruyama H., and Kawabata S., 2001. Regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis during fruit development in ‘Nyoho’ strawberry. J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 70(1): 28-32.
Lu N., Maruo T., Johkan M., Hohjo M., Tsukagoshi S., Ito Y., Ichimura T., and Shinohara Y., 2011. Effects of supplemental lighting within the canopy at different developing stages on tomato yield and quality of single-truss tomato plants grown at high density. Environ. Control Biol., 50(1):1-11.
Martine D., Andre G., and Marc JT., 1990. Annual greenhouse tomato production under a sequential intercropping system using supplemental light. Sci. Hortic., 45: 225-234.
Miura H., Yoshida M., and Yamasaki A., 1994. Effect of temperature on the size of strawberry fruit. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 62:769-774.
Miyoshi Y., Hidaka T., Hidaka K., Okayasu T., Yasutake D., and Kitano M., 2017. Dynamics of photosynthate loading in strawberries affected by light condition on source leaves. Environ. Control Biol., 55(1): 53-58.
Tubiello F.N., Salvatore M., Ross S., Ferrara A., Fitton N., and Smith P., 2013. The FAOSTAT database of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture. Environ. Res. Lett., 8(1):015009.
Wang SY. and Camp M.J., 2000. Temperatures after bloom affect plant growth and fruit quality of strawberry. Sci Hortic., 85: 183-199.