Current issue
Archive
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Journal Insights
Contact us
Publisher
Article Processing Charge
Editorial Policy
Peer Review Process
Publication Ethics
Guidelines
For Authors
For Reviewers
For Editors
Step-by-step Guide to Article Publishing
How to Promote Your Published Article
Reviewers
RESEARCH PAPER
Seed yield and physiological responses to deal with drought stress and late sowing date for promising lines of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)
1
Department of Agronomy, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran, P.O. Box: 13919-37911
2
Department of Agronomy, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran, P.O. Box: 31499-68111
3
Department of Oilseed Research, Seed and Plant Improvement Institute (SPII), Agricultural Research,
Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Iran, P.O. Box: 31359-33151
4
Department of Agronomy, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran, P.O. Box: 61349-37333
Final revision date: 2020-06-07
Acceptance date: 2020-06-22
Publication date: 2020-07-30
Corresponding author
Int. Agrophys. 2020, 34(3): 321-331
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The introduction of new genotypes of crop plants is among the most strategic research programmes, especially in arid and semi-arid regions. To study the effect of drought stress on seed yield and some physiological traits of promising lines of rapeseed at different sowing dates, an experiment was conducted for two years (2015-2017) in a semi-arid region of Iran. In this research, two conventional sowing dates were set in October 12 and November 1 (late sowing). Irrigation was carried out at two levels: normal irrigation (control) and irrigation interruption from the silique formation stage to the next stage (late-season drought stress). The genotypes included four promising lines (L1112, L1091, L1093, L1206), and a cultivar (Okapi) as a control. Results showed that delayed sowing and drought stress increased carbohydrate content and decreased seed yield, with the highest carbohydrate content and highest yield loss in L1112 and the lowest carbohydrate and lowest yield loss in the L1206 line. Among the physiological traits measured, stomatal resistance had the highest degree of correlation and the highest direct negative effect on seed yield, which declined with increasing stomatal resistance. L1112 had the highest stomatal resistance (52.76 s cm-1) in delayed sowing and drought stress conditions. Therefore, L1206 and L1112 were revealed to be resistant and sensitive lines, respectively.
REFERENCES (41)
1.
Akram N.A., Iqbal M., Muhammad A., Ashraf M., Al-Qurainy F., and Shafiq S., 2018. Aminolevulinic acid and nitric oxide regulate oxidative defense and secondary metabolisms in canola (Brassica napus L.) under drought stress. Protoplasma, 255, 163-174. https://doi:10.1007/s00709-017....
2.
Araus J.L., Slafer G.A., Royo C., and Serret M.D., 2008. Breeding for yield potential and stress adaptation in cereals. Critical Reviews in Plant Sci., 27, 377-412. https://doi: 10.1080/07352680802467736.
3.
Ardakani M.R., Pietsch G., Moghaddam A., Raza A., and Friedel J.K., 2009. Response of root properties to tripartite symbiosis between lucerne (Medicago sativa L.), rhizobia and mycorrhiza under dry organic farming conditions. Am. J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 4, 266-277. https://doi: 10.3844/ajabssp.2009.266.277.
4.
Arnon D.I., 1949. Determination of chlorophyll concentration in leaf tissues of plants. Plant Physiol, 24, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.24.....
5.
Ashkiani A., Sayfzadeh S., Shirani Rad A.H., Valadabadi A., and Hadidi Masouleh H., 2020. Effects of foliar zinc application on yield and oil quality of rapeseed genotypes under drought stress. J. Plant Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1080/019041....
6.
Balota M., Payne W.A., Evett S.R., and Lazar M.D., 2007. Canopy temperature depression sampling to assess grain yield and genotypic differentiation in winter wheat. Crop Sci., 47, 1518-1529. https://doi: 10.2135/cropsci2006.06.0383.
7.
Bates L.S., Waldren R.P., and Teare I.D., 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil, 39, 205-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0001....
8.
Bayat F., Mirlohi A., and Khodambashi M., 2009. Effects of endophytic fungi on some drought tolerance mechanisms of tall fescue in a hydroponics culture. Russ. J. Plant Physl., 56, 563-570. https://doi:10.1134/S102144370....
9.
Cardoso A.A., Randall J.M., and McAdam S.A., 2019. Hydraulics regulate stomatal responses to changes in leaf water status in the fern Athyrium filix-femina. Plant Physiol., 179, 533-543. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.18.....
10.
Cashin P., Mohaddes K., Raissi M., and Raissi M., 2014. The differential effects of oil demand and supply shocks on the global economy. Energy Econ., 44, 113-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enec....
11.
Chun S.C., Paramasivan M., and Chandrasekaran M., 2018. Proline accumulation influenced by osmotic stress in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiotic plants. Front Microbiol., 9, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.....
12.
Davaran Hagh E., Mirshekari B., Ardakani M.R., Farahvash F., and Rejali F., 2016. Optimizing phosphorus use in sustainable maize cropping via mycorrhizal inoculation. J. Plant Nutr., 39, 1348-1359. https://doi.org/10.1080/019041....
13.
Din J., Khan S.U., Ali I., and Gurmani A.R., 2011. Physiological and agronomic response of canola varieties to drought stress. J. Anim. Plant Sci., 21, 78-82.
14.
Drake P., Froend R., and Franks P., 2013. Smaller, faster stomata: scaling of stomatal size, rate of response, and stomatal conductance. J. Exp. Bot., 64, 495-505. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/er....
15.
Dubois M., Gilles K.A., Hamilton J.K., Rebers P.A., and Smith F., 1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and relatedsubstances. Anal. Chem., 28, 350-356. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac6011....
16.
Enjalbert J.N., Zheng S., Johnson J.J., Mullen J.L., Byrne P.F., and McKay J.K., 2013. Brassicaceae germplasm diversity for agronomic and seed quality traits under drought stress. Ind. Crops Prod., 47, 176-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indc....
17.
FAO, 2018. World food and agriculture - Statistical pocketbook 2018. Rome, 255 pp. http://www.fao.org/publication....
18.
Ferrat I.L. and Loval C.J., 1999. Relation between relative water content, nitrogen pools, and growth of P. vulgaris and P. acutifolius during water deficit. Crop Sci., 39, 467-474. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsc....
19.
Gaspar T., Franck T., Bisbis B., Kevers C., Jouve L., Hausman J.F., and Dommes J., 2002. Concepts in plant stress physiology. Application to plant tissue cultures. J. Plant Growth Regul., 37, 263-285. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020....
20.
Grewal H.S., 2010. Water uptake, water use efficiency, plant growth and ionic balance of wheat, barley, canola and chickpea plants on a sodic vertisol with variable subsoil NaCl salinity. Agric. Water Manag., 97, 148-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwa....
21.
Hammac W.A., Maaz T., Koeing R.T., Burke I.C., and Pan W.L., 2017. Water and temperature stresses impact canola (Brassica napus L.) fatty acid, protein and yield over nitrogen and sulfur. J. Agr. Food Chem., 47, 67-78. https://doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b02778.
22.
Hara M., Harazaki A., and Tabata K., 2013. Administration of isothiocyanates enhances heat tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Growth Regul., 69, 71-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725....
23.
Henry C., John G.P., Pan R., Bartlett M.K., Fletcher L.R., Scoffoni C., and Sack L., 2019. A stomatal safety-efficiency trade-off constrains responses to leaf dehydration. Nat. Commun., 10, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467....
24.
Hoseinzade H., Ardakani M.R., Shahdi A., Asadi Rahmani H., Noormohammadi G., and Miransari M., 2016. Rice (Oryza sativa L.) nutrient management using mycorrhizal fungi and endophytic Herbaspirillum seropedicae. J. Integr. Agr., 15, 1385-1394. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-... (15)61241-2.
25.
Ilkaee M.N., Paknejad F., Zavareh M., Ardakani M.R., and Kashani A., 2011. Prediction model of leaf area in soybean (Glycine max L.). Am. J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 6, 110-113. https:// doi: 10.3844/ajabssp.2011.110.113.
26.
Jaleel C.A., Manivannan P., Wahid A., Farooq M., Al-Juburi H.J., Somasundaram R., and Panneerselvam R., 2009. Drought stress in plants: a review on morphological characteristics and pigments composition. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 11, 100-105.
27.
Khan M.A., Ashraf M.Y., Mujtaba S.M., Shirazi M.U., Khan M.A., Shereen A., Mumtaz S., Siddiqui M.A., and Kaler G.M., 2010. Evaluation of high yielding canola type brassica genotypes/ mutants for drought tolerance using physiological indices as screening tool. Pak. J. Bot., 42, 3807-3816.
28.
Krouma A., 2010. Plant water relations and photosynthetic activity in three Tunisian chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes subjected to drought. Turk. J. Agric. For., 34, 257-264. https://doi: 10.3906/tar-0904-1.
29.
Naroui Rad M.R., Jaafar H.Z.E., Akbari Moghaddam H., Poodineh O., and Moayedi H., 2010. Relation between physiological and some agronomic characteristics in selected genotypes of wheat in drought stress condition. J. Food Agric. Environ., 8, 891-893. https://doi.org/10.1234/4.2010....
30.
Nasiri A., Samdaliri M., Rad A.S., Shahsavari N., Kale A.M., and Jabbari H., 2017. Effect of plant density on yield and physiological characteristics of six canola cultivars. J. Sci. Agric., 1, 249-253. https://doi: 10.25081/jsa.2017.v1.819.
31.
Pace R. and Benincasa P., 2010. Effect of salinity and low osmotic potential on the germination and seedling growth of rapeseed cultivars with different stress tolerance. Ital. J. Agro., 5, 69-77. https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.20....
32.
Papanatsiou M., Petersen J., Henderson L., Wang Y., Christie J.M., and Blatt M.R., 2019. Optogenetic manipulation of stomatal kinetics improves carbon assimilation, water use, and growth. Sci., 363, 1456-1459. https://doi.org/10.1126/scienc....
33.
Pasban Eslam B., Monirifar H., and Sadeghi Bakhtavari A.R., 2017. Morpho-physiological response of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) genotypes to drought stress. Crop Breed. J., 7, 49-56. https://doi.org/10.22092/cbj.2....
34.
Reynolds M.P., Nagarajan S., Razzaque M.A., and Ageeb O.A.A., 2016. Heat tolerance. In: Application of Physiology in Wheat Breeding (Eds M.P. Reynolds, J.I. Oritz- Monastrio, and A. McNab) Mexico, D.F., CIMMYT. PP: 124-136.
35.
Sanchez-Rodriguez E., Rubio-Wilhelmi M.M., Cervilla L.M., Blasco B., Rios J.J., Rosales M.A., Romero L., and Ruiz J.M., 2010. Genotypic differences in some physiological parameters symptomatic for oxidative stress under moderate drought in tomato plants. Plant Sci., 178, 30-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plan....
36.
Saranga Y., Menz M., Jiang C.X., Wright R.J., Yakir D., and Paterson A.H., 2001. Genomic dissection of genotype × environment interactions conferring adaptation of cotton to arid conditions. Genome Res., 11, 1988-1995. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.157....
37.
Taiz L., Zeiger E., Moller I.M., and Murphy A., 2018. Plant Physiology and Development. Oxford University Press, UK.
38.
Trueba S., Pan R., Scoffoni C., John G.P., Davis S.D., and Sack L., 2019. Thresholds for leaf damage due to dehydration: declines of hydraulic function, stomatal conductance and cellular integrity precede those for photochemistry. New Phytol., 223, 134-149. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15....
39.
Wu W., Ma B.L., and Whalen J.K., 2018. Enhancing rapeseed tolerance to heat and drought stresses in a changing climate: perspectives for stress adaptation from root system architecture. Adv. Agron., 151, 87-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agr....
40.
Yan D., Easwaran V., Chau V., Okamoto M., Ierullo M., and Kimura M., 2016. NIN-like protein 8 is a master regulator of nitrate-promoted seed germination in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun., 7, 13179. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms....
41.
Yuncai H. and Schmidhalter U., 2005. Drought and salinity: A comparison of the effects of drought and salinity. J. Plant. Nutr. Soil Sci., 168, 541-549. https://doi:10.1002/jpln.20042....
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2300-8725 |
| ISSN: | 0236-8722 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
