Effect of moisture content on the physical and mechanical properties of quinoa seeds
More details
Hide details
Department of Food Engineering and Technology, Sant Longowal Institute of Engineering and Technology, Sangrur, Punjab 148106, India
Publish date: 2019-02-13
Acceptance date: 2018-06-29
Int. Agrophys. 2019, 33(1): 41–48
The study was conducted to compare the engineering properties of Indian quinoa seeds with increase in moisture content. Close dependency of the properties on moisture content was observed. Two germplasms of quinoa IC-411824 and EC-507739 were investigated. The results showed that the principal dimensions of EC-507739 were higher than those of IC-411824. With an increase in moisture mean values of true density increased from 993 to 1166 kg m-3 for EC-507739 and from 984 to 1097 kg m-3 for IC-411824. Coefficient of friction showed an increase of 16.29, 16.00, and 18.93% against glass, galvanized iron and wood respectively in case of IC-411824. However, for EC-507739 increase of 19.12, 22.73, and 23.21% was observed against glass, galvanized iron and wood respectively. Mechanical properties were higher for EC-507739 than IC-411824 and decreased with increase in moisture content for both the varieties. Mechanical behavior of seed can be used in designing of grinding machines.
1. Abalone R., Cassinera A., Gastón A., and Lara M.A., 2004. Some physical properties of Amarnath seeds. Biosyst. Eng., 89(1), 109-117.
2. Altuntaş E., Özgöz E., and Taşer Ö.F. 2005. Some physical properties of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graceum L.) seeds. J. Food Eng., 71(1), 37-43.
3. Bahnasawy A.H., 2007. Some physical and mechanical properties of garlic. Int. J. Food Eng., 3, 1-18.
4. Balasubramanian S., Singh K.K., and Kumar R., 2012. Physical properties of coriander seeds at different moisture content. Int. Agrophys., 26, 419-422.
5. Bamgboye A.I. and Adejumo O.I., 2009. Physical properties of roselle (Hibiscus sabdeferra) seeds. Agric. Eng. Int. CIGR E-journal. Manuscript 1154, XI, 1-13.
6. Baumler E., Cuniberti A., Nolasco S.M., and Riccobene I.C., 2006. Moisture dependent physical and compression properties of safflower seed. J. Food Eng., 72(2), 134-140.
7. Deshpande S.O., Bal S., and Ojha T.P., 1993. Physical properties of soybean. J. Agr. Eng. Res., 56, 89-98.
8. Food and Agriculture Organization 1998, FAO. Underutilized Andean Food Crops. FAO, Rome, Italy.
9. Izli N., Unal H., and Sincik M., 2009. Physical and mechanical properties of rapeseed at different moisture content. Int. Agrophys., 23, 137-145.
10. Jacobsen S.E., Mujica A., and Jensen C.R., 2003. The resistance of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to adverse abiotic factors. Food Rev. Int., 19, 99-109.
11. Jan K.N., Panesar P.S., Rana J.C., and Singh S., 2017a. Structural, thermal and rheological properties of starches isolated from Indian quinoa varieties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 102, 315-322.
12. Jan K.N., Panesar P.S., and Singh S., 2017b. Process standardization for isolation of quinoa starch and its characterization in comparison with other starches. J. Food Meas Charact., 11(4), 1919-1927.
13. Jan K.N., Panesar P.S., and Singh S., 2017c. Textural, in vitro antioxidant activity and sensory characteristics of cookies made from blends of wheat-quinoa grown in India. J. Food Process Preserv., 42(3), e13542.
14. Jan K.N., Panesar P.S., and Singh S., 2018. Optimization of antioxidant activity, textural and sensory characteristics of gluten-free cookies made from whole indian quinoa flour. LWT, 93, 573-582.
15. Joshi D.C., Das S.K., and Mukherjee R.K., 1993. Physical properties of pumpkin seeds. J. Agr. Eng. Res., 54, 219-229.
16. Kibar H., Öztürk T., and Esen B., 2010. The effect of moisture content on physical and mechanical properties of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Spanish J. Agric. Res., 8, 741-749.
17. Kingsly A.R.P., Singh D.B., Manikantan M.R., and Jaib R.K., 2006. Moisture dependent physical properties of dried pomegranate seed (anaradana). J. Food Eng., 75, 492-496.
18. Malik M.A. and Saini C.S., 2016. Engineering properties of sunflower seed: Effect of dehulling and moisture content. Cogent Food Agric., 2(1), 1145783, 1-11.
19. McCabe W.L., Smith J.C., and Harriot P., 1986. Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.
20. Mohsenin N.N., 1970. Physical properties of plant and animal materials New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.
21. Mohsenin N.N., 1986. Physical Properties of Plant and Animal Materials. Gordon and Breach Press, New York, USA.
22. Noomhorm A. and Verma L.R., 1982. A comparison of microwave, air oven and moisture meters with the standard method for rough rice moisture determination. Trans. ASAE, 25(5), 1464-1470.
23. Ozguven F. and Kubilay V., 2004. Some physical, mechanical and aerodynamic properties of pine (Pinus pinea) nuts. J. Food Eng., 68(2), 191-196.
24. Razavi S. and Milani E., 2006. Some physical properties of the watermelon seeds. African J. Agric. Res., 13, 65-69.
25. Saiedirad M.H., Tabatabaeefar A., Borghei A., Mirsalehi M., Badii F., and Varnamkhasti M.G., 2008. Effects of moisture content, seed size, loading rate and seed orientation on force and energy required for fracturing cumin seed (Cuminum cyminum L.) under quasi-static loading. J. Food Eng., 86, 565-572.
26. Sharma R., Sogi D.S., and Saxena D.C., 2009. Dehulling performance and textural characteristics of unshelled and shelled sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) seeds. J. Food Eng., 92, 1-7.
27. Singh R.K., Vishwakarma R.K., Vishal M.K., Singh S.K., and Saharan V.K., 2015. Moisture dependent physical properties of nigella seeds. Afr. J. Agric. Res., 10(2), 58-66.
28. Van Etten C.H., Miller R.W., Wolff I.A., and Jones Q., 1963. Amino acid composition of seeds from 200 angiosperm plants. J. Agric. Food Chem., 11, 399-410.
29. Vilche C., Gely M., and Santalla E., 2003. Physical properties of quinoa seeds. Biosyst. Eng., 86 (1), 59-65.
30. Visvanathan R., Palanisamy P.T., Gothandapani L., and Sreenarayanan V.V., 1996. Physical properties of neem nut. J. Agr. Eng. Res., 63, 19-26.